IMAGE EVALUATION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-SUPPORTED OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY IMAGING USING OCT-A1 DEVICE IN DIABETIC RETINOPATHY.

Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan .

Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.). 2021;(8):1730-1738

Abstract

PURPOSE To investigate the effect of denoise processing by artificial intelligence (AI) on the optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) images in eyes with retinal lesions. METHODS Prospective, observational, cross-sectional study. Optical coherence tomography angiography imaging of a 3 × 3-mm area involving the lesions (neovascularization, intraretinal microvascular abnormality, and nonperfusion area) was performed five times using OCT-HS100 (Canon, Tokyo, Japan). We acquired AI-denoised OCTA images and averaging OCTA images generated from five cube scan data through built-in software. Main outcomes were image acquisition time and the subjective assessment by graders and quantitative measurements of original OCTA images, averaging OCTA images, and AI-denoised OCTA images. The parameters of quantitative measurements were contrast-to-noise ratio, vessel density, vessel length density, and fractal dimension. RESULTS We studied 56 eyes from 43 patients. The image acquisition times for the original, averaging, and AI-denoised images were 31.87 ± 12.02, 165.34 ± 41.91, and 34.37 ± 12.02 seconds, respectively. We found significant differences in vessel density, vessel length density, fractal dimension, and contrast-to-noise ratio (P < 0.001) between original, averaging, and AI-denoised images. Both subjective and quantitative evaluations showed that AI-denoised OCTA images had less background noise and depicted vessels clearly. In AI-denoised images, the presence of fictional vessels was suspected in 2 of the 35 cases of nonperfusion area. CONCLUSION Denoise processing by AI improved the image quality of OCTA in a shorter time and allowed more accurate quantitative evaluation.

Methodological quality

Publication Type : Observational Study

Metadata